Executive Summary
AI
- Michael Levin returns to the podcast to explain the central question of his Tufts labs: how embodied minds arise in the physical world, treated in first, second and third person terms.9:49
- He places every system on what he calls the spectrum of persuadability, where the choice between a wrench, a thermostat setting, training, or conversation is an empirical hypothesis about which interaction protocol will work, not an armchair judgement.13:00
- Levin rejects any sharp line between non-living and living or non-mind and mind, arguing that convenient categories like "adult" — fixed at 18 in court, closer to 25 in car rental accident statistics — now hold science back by blocking the transfer of behavioural tools.22:23
- What scales, he says, is the cognitive light cone, the size of the biggest goal a system can actively pursue; living things align small-goal parts into collectives with larger goals, and cancer is that light cone shrinking back to an amoeba's.35:50
- The lab tests this by building beings that never existed — xenobots from frog embryonic cells and anthrobots from adult human tracheal epithelia, with over 9,000 differential gene expressions, which spontaneously knit scratched human neurons back together.1:00:49
Key Quote
“And the cognitive light cone is the size of the biggest goal state that you can pursue.”
— Michael Levin35:54
Key Quote
“And intelligence is the degree of ingenuity that it has in overcoming barriers between it and its goal.”
— Michael Levin42:50
Key Quote
“So that's really all I'm arguing for is an empirical approach.”
— Michael Levin45:02