Recording intelligenceAI-generated brief · check the source for context

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

1:31:44 recording · EN · 2 speakers

Listen to the original

Listen to the episode
Executive Summary AI
  • Lizzie Bassett admits she had never seen the film, number 10 on the IMDb Top 250, despite being assigned it yearly by IMDb's CEO, and now loves it, especially Eli Wallach and Lee Van Cleef.1:48
  • After United Artists bought For a Few Dollars More for a million dollars, Luciano Vincenzoni improvised a pitch for a third film, securing a $1 million budget, a $500,000 advance and 50% of receipts outside Italy.16:56
  • Clint Eastwood signed for $250,000, 10% of the back end and a Ferrari, Charles Bronson lost the role of the bad to The Dirty Dozen, and Lee Van Cleef and Eli Wallach completed the trio.23:58
  • Shooting ran from mid-April to mid-July 1966, with Leone's perfectionism endangering Wallach in hanging and train stunts, and the bridge accidentally blown up without cameras rolling, then rebuilt in three days.42:23
  • Cut to 161 minutes for the US and dubbed from Mickey Knox's lip-sync script, the film grossed roughly $6 million on its million-dollar budget despite reviews like The New York Times' attack.1:04:05

Brief overview

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly emerged from chaotic deals, risky shoots and disputed credit, yet endures.

  1. Leone's legends often outran the factsHis Library of Congress gold-mine battle and 'favorite book' stories were contradicted by history and by Vincenzoni and Donati.
  2. Credit for the film is fiercely disputedVincenzoni, uncredited writer Sergio Donati and Leone each claimed the idea, the script or the key edits.
  3. Success sent the stars different waysEastwood founded Malpaso and began directing, while Lee Van Cleef stayed in Europe as a spaghetti Western king.

Questions this recording answers

10 questions, each answered where it is said
How did The Good, the Bad and the Ugly get financed?

After United Artists bought For a Few Dollars More, executives asked what was next. Vincenzoni invented a film about three rogues seeking treasure during the Civil War, and UA agreed to a million dollars. The team got a $500,000 advance and 50% of box office receipts outside Italy.

Answered around 16:56
What was Clint Eastwood paid for the film?

Eastwood got $250,000, 10% of the back end from Western Hemisphere distribution, and a Ferrari. According to Donati and Vincenzoni, Leone was unhappy because Eastwood cost 25% of the budget, and he initially resisted sharing the screen, fearing Tuco would upstage him.

Answered around 23:58
Why didn't Charles Bronson play the bad?

Bronson was first on the list and wanted in, having earlier turned down A Fistful of Dollars over its script. But he had just signed to make The Dirty Dozen and the dates conflicted, so Leone went with Lee Van Cleef, Eastwood's For a Few Dollars More co-star.

Answered around 24:33
How did Lee Van Cleef get into Leone's films?

Five days before shooting For a Few Dollars More, Leone ran into a drunk Van Cleef at a Los Angeles bar. After a scuffle, the bartender vouched for Leone, Van Cleef's agent came over, and they signed nine weeks of work at a thousand dollars per week. He flew to Rome the next day.

Answered around 27:38
Why was Eli Wallach cast as Tuco?

Leone wanted someone who could really do comedy. Wallach, a stage and screen veteran in his early 50s, sealed it with a small scene in How the West Was Won where his outlaw makes finger guns at George Peppard's sons, a moment both funny and menacing.

Answered around 29:29
What went wrong with the bridge explosion?

The effects technician let a Spanish army captain press the detonator on his cue. Mishearing a radio exchange, the captain pushed the button and the bridge exploded without cameras rolling. The captain's soldiers rebuilt it in three days on condition the technician got his job back, and the reshoot worked.

Answered around 56:00
Was there really a Civil War gold battle in Texas?

No. Leone claimed a Library of Congress librarian confirmed a battle over gold mines in Texas, but there were no such battles. The film loosely draws on the Battle of Glorieta Pass in New Mexico and the Confederate campaign led by Henry Hopkins Sibley, whose brigade included Texas regiments.

Answered around 36:44
Why do different cuts of the film exist?

United Artists wanted nothing over two hours, and Vincenzoni pushed for deep cuts, clashing with Leone. The Italian release ran about 177 minutes, while the US version was 161. Leone said they took away 20 minutes so people could buy popcorn; the extended cut restores scenes.

Answered around 1:04:05
How was the English version dubbed?

In fall 1967 in New York, American actor Mickey Knox wrote a lip-sync script over six weeks, matching new dialogue to actors' lips because no sync sound was recorded. Eastwood wanted his original lines, and a United Artists executive had to threaten him into reading the new version.

Answered around 1:04:38
How did the film perform on release?

In the US it made roughly $6 million on its million-dollar budget, near Hombre's $6.5 million. Reviews were mixed: The New York Times called it repellent and critics called it sadistic, though Wallach was praised and Roger Ebert gave it three out of four stars.

Answered around 1:08:32
Key Quote
“Well, Chris, I'm embarrassed to say I'd never seen this movie before we were doing this episode.”
— Lizzie Bassett1:48
Key Quote
“There were no Civil War battles over gold mines in Texas.”
— Chris36:44
Key Quote
“And Eastwood says, no, Sergio, we will stand right up here by you.”
— Chris55:33
Report this page
What is wrong with this page?