Transcribe the recording once, then search every line, ask it questions, and jump straight to the moment behind any answer. Built for the sitting you have to work through, not the clip you want to post.
100+ languages · speaker labels · timestamps throughout · your audio is never used to train a model
A committee sitting, an oral argument, a lecture series — the recording is three hours and the part you need is ninety seconds of it. Getting words on a page is the easy half. The work is going back to a passage, checking what was actually said, and being able to point at it.
Upload the file or paste a link. Long single-session recordings are the normal case here — there's no short length cap, and timestamps run the whole way through. Speakers are labelled, so you can tell the chair from the witness.
Type a phrase and get every line that contains it, each with its timestamp, so you can judge relevance before you jump. Accents and case are ignored — typing codigo finds código — which matters when the record isn't in English.
Ask what a provision requires, who raised an objection, or what was conceded — and get an answer grounded only in that transcript, replying in the language it was spoken in.
“What did the witness say about the compliance obligation?”Every timestamp in an answer is a link. Click it and the transcript jumps to that line and the audio plays from it — so you check the passage yourself before you rely on it, rather than taking a summary's word.
Export as plain text, Word, JSON, or subtitle formats with timings intact. Copy a passage with its timestamp straight into your notes or your draft.
Long records, more than one language, and a need to point at the source.
Full sittings where the useful exchange is buried in procedural hours. Search the debate for the clause, the objection, or the name.
Work a term's recordings into something searchable, then ask across a single lecture when revising a topic you half-remember.
Long-form conversation where the substance arrives unannounced two hours in, and quoting it means finding it exactly.
Recorded sessions on a draft instrument — search across what was said about a specific article rather than re-listening.
Whipscribe is a research tool. It transcribes what was said and helps you find it again. It does not interpret law, and nothing it produces is legal advice.
Transcription is machine-generated. It is strong on ordinary speech and weaker on proper nouns, figures, and technical vocabulary — exactly the things a citation turns on. Listen to the passage before you quote it in a filing, a paper, or anything else that matters. That is why every citation here is a link to the audio rather than a number on a page.
Priced per minute of audio, so a single long hearing is cheap and a term of them is predictable.
| Plan | Price | Minutes | Roughly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $4/mo | 300 | five hours — a couple of sittings |
| Pro | $12/mo | 2,000 | 33 hours — a research term |
| Team | $24/mo | 5,000 | 83 hours — a group or a clinic |
Asking questions of a transcript is included on every paid plan. Full pricing →
Upload a file or paste a link. You'll have it searchable in minutes, and you can ask it the question you actually opened it for.
Transcribe a recording →Yes. There's no short length cap, and long single-session recordings are the normal case here — committee hearings, oral arguments, full-day conferences. Timestamps run the whole way through.
Over 100 languages, and the transcript stays in the language it was spoken in — as do the answers when you ask questions of it. Search ignores accents, so typing codigo finds código.
Timestamps come from the audio itself, and every citation in an answer links to the exact line so you can hear it before you use it. Always listen to the passage before quoting it in anything that matters — transcription is machine-generated and can mishear names, figures and technical terms.
Whipscribe runs open-source Whisper on private infrastructure. Your audio is never sent to a third-party transcription service, and it is never used to train a model.
No. It's a research tool — it transcribes what was said and helps you find it again. Interpretation is yours.